Panasonic Lumix GX1. Bully or brother?

GX1. Bully or brother to the GF1?

 

Back in October 2009 Panasonic joined the Micro Four Thirds race by releasing their Lumix GF1 interchangable lens camera. It didn’t take long before the GF1 or it’s nearest competitor, the Olympus PEN E-P1 caught the attention of serious photographers in the amateur and professional world. Both offered a very compact mirrorless interchangeable lens system that shared the same mounting system. Interchangeability suddenly took on a new meaning. I was one of the people who jumped on the Micro Four Thirds bandwagon and chose the GF1 as my new toy. Here’s my take on it all and to be more precise, my take on the newly launched and much anticipated Lumix GX1

Why do I need yet another camera?

Working as a commercial photographer it’s all too easy to become too technical and sterile in ideas. A bag full of high quality DSLR’s and wide aperture lenses offer the technical security to producing high quality images for my clients. Couple that with the client’s technical brief and the scope for creativity is narrowed. It’s all too easy to switch into robot mode of producing the required images. Client happy, Rob Happy.

Up until recently, I’ve been getting to the situation that if I didn’t have a DLSR and bag of lenses with me I felt naked, even for non commercial work. After all, I could miss ‘that’ shot!
I needed an alternative, to get out of that mind-set and get back to my passion of making photographs with the equipment in hand, not what I might have in the bag. I bought a Panasonic GF1 and a 20mm 1.7 lens to force myself to start getting back to the basics of why I love photography.  Innocent and fun experimentation without getting wrapped up in technical details. I never intended to use GF1 for work, it was my every day fun camera. I love the GF1 and have no complaints with it.

1st  impression

However, as soon as I got the GX1 in my hands it was obvious that Panasonic were pointing at me, it feels more grown up than the GF1, they’ve added a grip of sorts to the body that really does make it feel more solid in the hand. The body is slightly thinner but that really doesn’t bother me, it’s still pocketable. (Albeit in a large pocket)
The menus seem familiar, programmable function buttons offer lots of custom setup options and everything feels robust. I’m not keen on the new on/off button though, the slider button of the GF1 has been replaced with a rotating control on the main function dial. It will just take some time to get used to.

Real world usage

The first test I wanted for the GX1 was in a working studio situation. Shooting portraits in studio with studio lights isn’t a particularly demanding situation. ISO values are generally kept very low and as long as the camera can trigger the flashes, technical capacities of the camera aren’t stressed at all. It’s more about handling and easy of use and final image quality. I’ve used the GF1 in the studio but it’s always felt alien. Yes, it works with my hotshoe flash trigger and the results always look good on the rear LCD but the colour output always falls short of my expectations.
Using the GX1 in studio was a very surprising event, faster and more accurate focus, easy handling and best of all, output that put the results of my expensive DLSR gear to shame. The GX1 has pushed the compact mirrorless camera into a new league of being a viable camera for studio. I would never have thought that! I needed to push this little camera a bit more, so I threw into the realms of the low noise DSLR, shooting under modeling lights. 2 studio lights with just their tungsten bulbs on, no flash. 1600ISO and a wide open lens. Hello? Yes, there is some noise but sharp, clean, colourful images with a grain that compliments rather than detracts. My old D2X couldn’t produce images like that at 400ISO..

Model: Charlotte De Bleecker
MU&H :Inge Van den Broeck

Back to candid

Despite the results in studio, shooting candid is what the GX1 is about to me. Pointing and shooting and enjoying it. I was dreading the thought of a touchscreen on a camera. I was pleasantly surprised that using the touch screen on the GX1 isn’t that painful. The most useful function of the touch screen is to select the focus area, you just have to touch the screen where you want to focus and it focuses there. It’s very intuitive and a lot faster than juggling buttons to move the focus area. Normally, I’d just leave the focus point centralized, focus and recompose the shot before shooting. All well and good, but I really did notice an increase in shooting speed when shooting from the hip by using the touchscreen method. I had secretly hoped it was still active when the EVF was fitted to the camera, alas no, you have to manually move the AF point or recompose.

 

Back to back but facing each other.

 

The EVF

On the subject of the EVF, it’s staying on the camera! I like it very much. Slightly laggy if you pan too fast but otherwise it’s bright it’s sharp, it offers a full in viewer display of all settings and menu options. Yes, It adds some bulk to the camera, it’ll probably drain the battery faster and it’s pretty expensive but there are 2 good reasons I like it.

Anyone who is long sighted will know that looking at the rear LCD screen of a compact camera isn’t the easiest thing to do without glasses. The EVF makes it a lot easier for me to see where the camera is focused and use the camera in bright sunlight.

The second reason might sound a little odd, but is the harsh reality. People take you more seriously if you are using a camera with a viewfinder rather than holding it out in front of you. Consider this: A professional turns up to a wedding and is using a small camera that he has to hold out in front of him, Uncle Bob style. People frown, they expect a pro’ to use a little more than a point and shoot.

Why am I even worried? After all, this is a fun camera for me to always have with me for candid shots. Well, honestly, the GX1 is grown up enough for me to seriously consider having it in my camera bag for some events. The very nature of its cute and unobtrusive nature will be an asset at wedding receptions. Wielding a large DSLR around when it’s totally unnecessary is confronting to guests at a wedding. The ability to blend in and work less conspicuously does yield much better results that fit into my style of photography. Again, the main improvements over the GF1, improved focus, lower image noise, better colours leave me in no doubt that I can trust the GX1 and use it’s images as worthy final images for some of my clients.

Kit lens

In contrast to the GX1, the new Lumix G X Vario PZ 14-42mm kit lens really doesn’t do anything for me. Don’t get me wrong, there is absolutely nothing wrong with the image quality from it. In fact, even wide open at 42mm it is very sharp. Wide open though is ‘just’ F5.6. That on the 2x crop effect of a Micro Four Thirds sensor really isn’t giving me a lot of creative scope for playing with depth of field. Besides, I use zooms all day for work, zooms make me lazy. This is an electronic zoom, good for the video market but not so good for photographers who want to move quickly from one end of the range to the other. Full marks to Panasonic for a great lens, but I’m going to stick to my ‘fast’ primes and use the manual zoom technique of walking closer to, or further way from my subject. If I get bored with the Micro Four Thirds lenses that are available, I can always use my Nikon lenses with a mount adaptor. Manual focus but a lot of fun.
Downsides?

Nothing is perfect and there a few little things that made me wonder. I’ve already mentioned the on/off switch being a little niggle and something to get used to. If you’re a tethered shooter and want to use an AC adaptor on the GX1 you better not mount it on a large tripod plate! Unlike the GF1’s cable hole in the side of the body, the GX1 has it’s hole in the battery door. On the bottom of the camera, not ideal. The thumbwheel that controls aperture/shutter and exposure compensation has been made even smaller. Why? With cold hands I already had a bit of a job to turn it and not to press it on the GF1, now I have to be even more careful.

 

Looking over the shoulder.

Conclusion.

So really, what started out as a venture into finding a good camera for fun has made a full circle and become a fun camera that’s good enough for some of my paid work. So why did I said at the start of this post that the GF1 was a toy?  Well. It was supposed to be my pocket camera, the one I always had with me, the one I’d just play with. It soon showed me that this camera format was more than a toy and now after using the GX1, the format has matured and can actually be used as a tool of the trade.

Panasonic have loaded the GX1 with just the right amount of goodies. No in camera panorama maker, no pop-art image processing, no gimmicks. It’s back to basics; it’s a serious enthusiast’s camera that won’t disappoint.
Will I upgrade from the GF1? It’s a close run thing, but yes. I will. The GX1 hasn’t bullied it’s way in on the GF1, it’s a big brother, the result of evolution. Not overkill, a subtle yet substantial tweak on what was already a good tool. It’s all the fun of the GF1 with a just a little bit more. I will still use it on my favourite setting of contrasty, black and white square images but with the knowledge that I can use colour, I can push the ISO further, I can experiment more!

It’s a win, win situation!

JPG output is stunning. Rich colours and depth that I missed on the GF1

The GX1 used in my favourite custom setting. Square Black & White. I just love it

Further reading and a full review of the GX1 including 2 more personal reviews from colleagues Tom Museeuw and Bert Stephani can be found in issue 17 of  SHOOT magazine, available on 14th February (the printed article will be in Dutch)

Feel free to join my Facebook page.

GX1 – In a real world situation.

Just  a quick post about using the GX1 in a real world environment…

We had a studio shoot today so it was an ideal chance to test out the little GX1 and to see what it could produce. What it did was blow my socks off. Not just a fan boy saying that either but I genuinely was surprised by what that little camera and the X vario 14-42mm delivered. Here are a few shots from today. Made under mixed lighting and with varying ISO ratings. Other than RAW conversion, some basic Lightroom adjustments that any other photo from any other camera would go through, these are as they are.  I know some people will say that anything can look good at web resolution. Believe me, I don’t need to trick people. The full write-up that’s coming later will have some full size samples.

In my world, this is as real as it can be.

 

F10 – 1/160s – 36mm – ISO 160

F9 – 1/160s – 41mm – ISO160

F5,6 – 1/80s – 41mm – ISO800

F5,6 – 1/60s – 41mm – ISO1000

F5,4 – 1/40s – 31mm – ISO1000

F5,4 – 1/25s – 31mm – ISO1000

F5,6 – 1/40 – 35mm – ISO1600

F5,6 – 1/40 – 35mm – ISO1600

Of course, for a shoot like this a good team is needed.

Special thanks to the fun and talented Inge Van den Broeck  for the fabulous make-up and hair.

Plus a big thanks to Charlotte for bringing the stunning looks and smiles.

Thank you ladies.

 

PedigreePana

I’ve owned a Panasonic GF1 Micro Four Thirds camera for about 18months now and love the little thing to bits. Now I’ve managed to get my sticky mitts on something very new. This is little puppy is said to have the same pedigree as the well respected GF1, I introduce to you, the GX1!

For now it’ll have to stay with the introduction, I’ve got a few days to train and tame the pup before I decide if it can stay. Tune in very soon for the full blown report on the Lumix GX1 and it’s mouthful of a partner, the new Lumix G X Vario PZ 14-42mm F3.5-5.6 ASPH OIS lens.

I AM | A BIT IMPRESSED

The internet is an amazing place, a place where news spreads faster than ever, news is posted as it happens, right there and then. Not only that, but the expectation of news is increasingly fueled by rumours spread through the Internet. Last night was one of those many events where rumours meet news, news is made and reported. For a brief moment the world is confronted by actual first had facts. The facts filter back into the Internet and are interpreted, digested and opinions are formed. This post is just one opinion of many that will be circulating today and in the next days or weeks.

I was called some weeks ago by the Nikon PR agency to invite me to Nikon Belgium’s HQ on the evening of the 6th January 2012. An announcement would be made. At that time I was sitting with 2 colleagues discussing camera gear, just as most media following photographers of today do. In turn we all had that call and invitation, we looked at each other and immediately the speculation started. What would it be! The follow-up to the D700, or the D3s? new lenses, new this, new that. We were spontaneously generating our own ideas based on our own needs and wishes for Nikon’s future. After a glass of beer’s worth of discussion we quickly dropped back into the reality and agreed, we’ll wait and see what they have to say.

The 6th January 2012 came. My first email of the day was from Nikon Belux to announce what I pretty much knew already. Nikon D4 camera,A new AF-S 85mm 1.8 lens and a new Wifi transmitter for the D4. Great! The lens I’ve been waiting for! Right on, a new full bodied pro level camera with some impressive specs and oh. Another wifi transmitter. Like many of my peers, I had an Internet trawl to find out more details on each of the 3 products, trying not to form much of an opinion until the evening where we’d be at the Mother-ship and be told the facts about the facts.
6pm came.
I think the Friday evening traffic around the Brussels ring knew that we were on a mission and suitably left us a clean path all the way from Ghent to Brussels. We had already been sitting at Nikon HQ since 5… I’d travelled with a colleague and author Piet Van Den Eynde and we were embarrassingly early for the event. Not a problem though, Maarten Goossens, NPS Service manager and our host for the evening was just as happy and welcoming to see us. A steady flow of people arrived, some familiar faces and some new ones. All with their own expectations, wishes, hopes and opinions.

 

I AM | WAFFLING

All seated, Maarten began the presentation in the usual fashion. Slides showing specs, details and illustration of how things have changed with the introduction of the new new flagship Nikon camera. Maarten is passionate about ‘his’ products and his passion comes from the fact that he’s a photographer. He’s there to sell, sure, but I could see the  genuine excitement in his expression that only a user would have. No rehearsed pitch there, no need, at that moment he’s talking to his peers, not simply rattling off a sales pitch.

I AM | COMFY

Anyway..  Ergonomic tweaks to what I already find a comfortable camera, the angle of the shutter button in relation to the body has been changed, there’s an extra rubber thumb grip on the vertical grip section of the body, the grip is a little rounder, the camera is a little lighter, the buttons around the rear LCD are slightly illuminated, etc, etc. Big deal, some might say. tweaks are a natural evolution, do they make it any better? The old adage ‘if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it’ comes to mind there. The D3 and The D3s were not broken at all, I really had no complaints about the ergonomics there However, seeing these small details change, and change in a gentle way is a sign that Nikon do listen to their people. The shutter button angle was changed because customer feedback from the world’s pool of users has popped up something at the Nikon R&D dept to say, hang on. This is being asked for. Illuminated buttons. How many times I’ve had to use the light of my phone to see where the buttons were! You can argue that a real pro can use the buttons like a real typist can type blind. I can’t type blind and I can’t always find the button on the first press. The extra thumb grip on the vertical grip section of the body.  Another answer to a question from X number of photographers throughout the world and it works. Holding the camera vertically suddenly got easier. I just hope Nikon have changed the glue they use to hold the rubber onto the body. My D3 needed to be completely ‘re-rubbered’ last year due to bits falling off. We’ll see if that has been addressed about 6 month down the line.

I AM | FOCUSED

The D4 uses an all new focus module that seems to be a natural step up in the D3s’ already good performance. Faster, bigger, better. More user feedback interpreted and incorporated. Changing AF modes got easier, now you can see clearly in the viewfinder what AF field you are in. Making switching fields a lot simpler and no need to take the camera away from your eye to do it. Faster AF, I saw this already in the little Nikon V1. Technology that filtered down to the consumer camera before the pro camera was even launched. Improved low light focusing. Already pretty good in the D3s, it’s been further improved and noticeably so.
Face tracking. On a pro camera? Hang on, the explanation Maarten gave about the implementation and use of face tracking in the D4 went beyond my impression of it being a Point and shoot gimmick. The AF and exposure system uses the face tracking technology to go way beyond that. This is where the sports photographer will love it. It’ll nail the faces in sports and keep nailing them for the full high speed burst. Not only that, coupled with the new 91k pixel exposure metering system, it’ll make sure the exposure and white balance are bang on too. Of course, I couldn’t test that to the extreme last night but I was convinced that it was a big step up. The face tracking tech will also encourage me to use Aperture priority a bit more for situations such as weddings. A situation where I have worked exclusively in full manual out of habit and experience. Relying on Aperture priority to correctly exposure a bride’s face and dress when walking into a back-lit church just seemed easier in manual than having to let the camera guess what I wanted and then have to use the EV compensation to effectively make a semi auto mode back into a manual mode. I’m looking forward to testing this new system in the real world where this could help out a lot.

I AM | MOVING

One of the sure-fire additions I had on my list of things that would get into the D4 was improved video capability. I’ve got a D7000 which I’d dabbling with for video work. It’s the way things are going, it’s the exciting market all the DSLR producers are tapping into it. As a relative newbie to the video world I was very impressed by a few features in the D4. Of course, the standard full HD output that we all expect but now saved as horrible to edit plain .mov format but now a from what I’ve been led to understand as the standard. H.264/MPEG-4 format. Maarten demonstrated live video output via HDMI too, the video boys in the room loved this. Stream live feed out of the camera and directly to an external recording / production / broadcast? As well as watching live on the camera’s LCD screen? Even to me, that got my mind thinking of the possible options this opens up. Stepless electronic Aperture adjustment during video recording, shooting stills while video recording, on screen volume feedback, various other features that can be read in all the official spec sheets.  What I did like was the ability to choose the output video range. How so? Well, the full sensor can be used or a DX crop area can be recorded, or a native 1920×1080 can be cropped out of the sensor, effectively giving the user options of how to represent the focal length of their lenses. I just know what I heard as reactions from the Canon users present and the video guys. Hello Nikon!

I AM | NOCTURNAL

The ISO and megapixel race has been with is since the dawn of digital. Finding a happy medium between output size and output quality. The D4 goes up to the 204800 ISO. in colloquial terms. ‘like, WTF?’ My D2x bottomed out at a usable ISO of 400. These new machines are just opening up doors like a SWAT team on the hurry. Low light work is a breeze now and makes me wonder how we all managed just a few years ago. Hands on,  shot off a few shots at the meeting at 12800 with the new 1.8 85mm lens. Bang on sharp, and with about the same noise I’d expect from a 5000ISO shot on a D3s. A native 100 ISO is very welcome too and all coupled to 16mp images. yes, this was impressive to me as a photographer who shoots in a lot of different situations. Sports shooters, wedding shooters, reportage shooters all going to love this.
On the subject of ISO. Auto ISO has always confused me and I’ve kept away from it. I’ve not appreciated the automatic settings over-riding my idea of how a scene should look. This new setup is clever. You can specify the amount of Auto ISO adjustment per lens… For example. You use a 17-35, you can shoot that comfortably at very shutter speed so the ISO range can be pretty low to ensure that you maintain a comfortable minimum shutter speed. At 600mm though, you’re looking at using a minimum of 600th/s to get a steady shot (ok, VR will help of course) For this lens, the camera can be programmed to use a min and max ISO of a higher range to ensure that the min shutter speed is met. All clever stuff.

I AM | CONNECTED

I saw the WT-5 transmitter announced and thought it’ll be another expensive lump of plastic that’ll suck the camera dry. Boy, was I wrong. A tiny box that screws onto a dedicated socket on the body. No additional wires to get in the way. Faster throughput, better and more reliable connection via HTTP or FTP protocols. Transmission and reception that can send images directly to a portable device to be evaluated and transmitted via mail or uploaded online. News journalists will love this. Personally, I’m loving the idea of finally having a viable and reliable solution for event work. Live projection of images, live printing. Lots of options there. Not only that but the camera can be controlled via the Wifi connection, more than one camera can be triggered at once, remotely. And the  best bits, the WT-5 uses less power and is actually cheaper than the WT-4.  Even without the optional extra of the WT-5, the D4 has a built in Ethernet port. For me personally, not a biggie but again for the video and big organisations relying heavily on data transfer, this will be very welcome.

I AM | A BIT IN AWE

ok, nitty gritty. I’ve written too much about the camera that can already be read elsewhere but I’ve picked out only a few features and examples from my standpoint as commercial photographer. These are the bits that stood out to me and hit home as things to call up as changes that warrant an upgrade from a D3s. For many it’ll be over-kill. An out and out sports camera, high speed frame rate, loads of power, brutal in every respect. I see it from a my point of view. I see the lower 100ISO starting point as a bonus for studio work, I see the higher ISO ranges also as a bonus for studio work where I’m increasingly using constant light or daylight. I love that feel of non-sterile images made at higher ISO, the richness of skins tones. 16mp is a good size, not D3x size or medium format size but as far as I’m concerned, a happy medium and tradeoff. Outside the studio on my reportage and wedding work. I might just get Aperture priority to help me out now. Just to make my life a little easier, my thinking can be used on making the image rather than taking it. Weight is down, a small help, carrying these machines is a chore at times, ergonomic tweaks look and feel nice to me. Increased efficiency, better battery life, etc, etc. Handling is not far removed from my trusty D3 and I felt at home holding the D4.
I’d convinced myself that my next body would be a smaller one, D700ish. Lighter, more portable, etc, etc. At this moment there is no followup to the D700 so the speculation and rumour mill will be working hard again in the next weeks. I’m not bothered. I’m all but convinced that the D4 covers my needs and then some. I’m in no rush though. I can wait a while to see what the next Nikon HQ get-together announces.

 

…Problem is, can I wait that long ?…

I AM | YOUR WISH

85mm 1.8 AF-S
YOU ARE MINE!

Oops, bit enthusiastic there.. Long story short. Wanted an 85mm for some time. Nikon 85mm 1.4 is expensive. No polite way to say that. Other options were. Sigma 85mm 1.4, Nikon 85mm 1.8 AF-D. Then along came the AF-S version and my quick test shots last night in poor light, wide open and at high ISO.

I AM | ORDERING ONE AND BADGERING NIKON ‘TILL I GET IT

 

There you go, some personal opinions on the latest Nikon products.

Huge thanks to Nikon for the invite and hospitality.

The Tiny WT-5 transmitter. I had no idea it was actually that small. Nother beats a hands-on presentation. Some things just can’t be felt via press releases.

The front view of the D4, not that far removed from an already successful design.

 

 

Presentation boxes

One of the things I offer wedding clients is a boxed set of prints. Rather than a closed box of prints this option can be used to display the prints at all times. If you’re bored with one photo it can be swapped for any of the 11 other photos that are stored in the box.
The 15x15cm photos are printed on high quality paper and mounted on think white card.